Facebook Twitter Flickr

Getting real close: Nokia Lumia 1520 vs Samsung Galaxy K Zoom

Now that we’ve seen that an optical zoom can be very practicle even on a device with not the very best camera specifications, let’s see how close we can actually get – and what the differences are.

With the Samsung Galaxy K Zoom, you can’t use the optical zoom when you choose the “macro” setting. With the Nokia Lumia 1520 however, you can focus as close as possible and zoom in next.

In the last case, you’ll end up with a 5MP shot that brings you a lot closer at first sight, but in fact it’s only a matter of reframing what you’d get at full resolution. With the Samsung Galaxy K Zoom, you’ll get a 20.7MP close-up of the same scene. But: which one if more pleasing to the eye?

Weather is terrible today here in The Netherlands, so I simply picked a few Nokia goodies I always carry with me, focussing as close as possible. I made several shots with both devives and picked the best they produced.

Here we go. First a part of my laptop keybooard, focussing on the center (so: the “5″). Nokia Lumia 1520 first, Samsung Galaxy K Zoom next.

1 Nokia Lumia 1520 - keyboard 1 Samsung Galaxy K Zoom keyboard

Well, that’s pretty obvious I think. Lumia 1520 is way better in colors and contrast, the K Zoom once more giving a far too bright result. Note I managed to get just a bit closer with the Nokia Lumia 1520.

I could bother you with the crops as well, but we’re comparing a 5MP with a 20.7MP shot – so in fact they’re impossible to compare – and I think these close-up results speak for themselves.

Next up, a Nokia USB stick (why not :-). Don’t ask me why, suddenly the Nokia Lumia 1020 gives me the brighter shot.

2 Nokia Lumia 1520 Nokia USB 1 2 Samsung Galaxy K Zoom Nokia USBIt’s remarkable: although brighter, colors of the Lumia 1520 are way more pleasing and accurate in this example – and again, I managed to get even quite a bit closer.

Last example: two Nokia chargers. Again, colors on the Lumia 1520 are way better, the Galaxy Zoom giving me a too “milky” result (check the red for instance!). Also, details are better of the Lumia 1520 – and I managed to focus a bit closer once again. 3 Nokia Lumia 1520 chargers 3 Samsung Galaxy K Zoom chargers

These close-up are all taken inside with artificial light and all settings on automatic. I guess it’s safe to say these circumstances aren’t the best for the Galaxy K Zoom. Like so many have predicted, tt does lose a lot of it’s attraction when you rule out the optical zoom and end up using it in less favorable light.

Yes, I’m still waiting for the Nokia Lumia 930 to compare with the 1520. I’ve heard its algorhythms have significantly improved, so I’m really looking forward to see what the Nokia imaging team has been able to improve!

Please join PureViewClub on TwitterFacebookFlickrGoogle+ and/or Instagram.

Lightning Ad 3


 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
4 Comments  comments 

4 Responses

  1. You can always tell an expert! Thanks for counnibttirg.

  2. bigs

    It is obvious Nokia/Microsoft have optimized their sensor with it’s image processing engine. The result seems to be more true to life colors, and the ability to maintain detail, whist keeping a little noise grain which is turn keeps the image realistic. The Samsung approach seems to be more towards a full consumer package with vibrant rich colors, and noise free images by means of fancy edge enhancement and higher than normal noise reduction

  3. Easy win of 808 :)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>